TEACHING READING BY USING GIST STRATEGY VIEWED FROM THE STUDENTS’ COGNITIVE ASPECT ON THE EXTENSIVE LEVEL OF ENGLISH DEPARTMENT STUDENTS IKIP PGRI MADIUN

Nuri Ati Ningsih, Arri Kurniawan

Abstract


This research aimed at (1) describing the implementation of GIST strategy in the process of teaching reading viewed from the cognitif aspect having by the students; (2) finding the positif aspects of the implementation of GIST strategy; (3) knowing the weaknesses of the implementation of GIST strategy in the process of teaching reading viewed from the cognitive aspect.

The method in this research was descriptive qualitative. In doing the research, there were some steps to be implemented to collect the data. They were observation, interview, and documentation. Then, analyzing data was done by reducing the data, presenting the data and drawing conclusion or verification.      

The result of the research showed that (1) GIST has been implemented maximally by the lecture based on the characteristics of this teaching strategy. To dig up the students’ cognitive aspects, the lecture provide the specific worksheet which represents the students’ cognitive level for higher order thinking skill, (2) GIST creates the students’ character in a good manner, such as; active, responsible and confident.They also learn how to work in a team; (3) Some weaknesses found in this research are; It needs a long time to create the instrument  to support  the implementation of GIST and Evaluation must be done by combining both cognitif level and  the level of reading ability.


Keywords


GIST; Teaching Reading; Extensive Level; Cognitive

Full Text:

PDF

References


Aebersold, Jo Ann & Field, Marrie Lee. 1997. From Reader to Reading Teacher. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Anderson, L. W. and David R. Krathwohl, D. R., et al (Eds..) (2001) A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Allyn & Bacon. Boston, MA (Pearson Education Group

Akmar Mohamad in http ://iteslj. org/ Techniques / Mohamad-Testing Reading.html

Brown, H. Douglas. 2000. Principles of Language Learning and Teaching. San Francisco: Addison Wesley Longman Inc.

Brown, H. Douglas. 2004. Language Assessment Principles and Classroom Practices. San Francisco: Addison Wesley Longman Inc.

Burhan, Nurgiyantoro, 2001, Penilaian dalam Pengajaran Bahasa dan Sastra, BPFE, Yogyakarta

Dahloan in http:// www. Associated content. Com/ shared /print.Shtml? content_type =ar

Deborah dalam www. Deborah healey.com/ reading/tataouine-summaries.pdf.

Elizabeth. 2004. Learning and Instruction. New York : Mc Graw-Hill, Inc.

Gronlund, N.E., & Linn, R.L. (1990). Measurement and Evaluation in Teaching (6th ed.). New York: MacMillan.

Herrell, Andrienne L, (2008), Strategies for Teaching English Language Learners, Pearson Merrill Prentice Hall.

Lems, Kristin, et al. 2010. Teaching Reading to English Language Leraners, New York London: Guilford Press

.

Margono. 2000. Metodologi Penelitian Pendidikan. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Morellion Judi, 2007. Collaborating Strategies for Teaching Reading Comprehension. Chicago; American Library Assosiation.

Nuttal, Christine. 2005. Teaching Reading Skills in Foreign Language, London: Heinemann Educational Book.

Nuri Ati Ningsih, Arri Kurniawan. 2013. Laporan Penelitian Dikti: Kajian Kemampuan Membaca Teks Bahasa Inggris Mahasiswa Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris Pada Level Extensive IKIP PGRI Madiun. LPPM IKIP PGRI Madiun.

Rianto Adi.2005. Metodologi Penelitian Sosial dan Hukum. Jakarta: Granit.

Suharsimi Arikunto. 2002. Prosedur Penelitian. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Sugiyono. 2007. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan: Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung : Alfabeta.

Sukardi.2006. Penelitian Kualitatif Naturalistik Dalam Pendidikan. Yogyakarta: Usaha Keluarga.

Sutopo H.B. 2002. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Surakarta: Sebelas maret University Press.

Yatim Riyanto .2001. Metodologi Penelitian Pendidikan. Surabaya. SIC


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


ETJ Stats