THE POSITIONING MATTERS OF THE DOLL’S HOUSE IN POSTCOLONIALISM

Dwi Mega Fitriana

Abstract


The purpose of this research is to analyze the self-positioning and social class phenomenon of The Doll’s House. It tells about social oppression create by upper to dominate lower class. Upper class takes part as dominant while lower class takes part as minority in society. This research uses qualitative research. The researcher needs postcolonial theory to identify the self-positioning between upper and lower class in the short story. The analysis reveals that upper class treats lower class to be the other, subaltern and create social discrimination. The conclusion is the upper class founds powerful, otherwise the lower class is found surviving not fighting from injustice.


Keywords


Postcolonialism; Self-positioning

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ashcroft, B., Griffiths, G., & Tiffin, H. (Eds.). (2003). The Post-Colonial Studies Reader. London: Routledge.

Berg, L., B. (2001). Qualitative Research Methods for the Social Sciences (fourth ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

Bobo, L., D & Fox, C. (2003). Race, Racism, and Discrimination: Bridging Problems, Methods, and Theory in Social Psychological Research. Social Psychology Quarterly. Vol. 66, No. 4, pp. 319-332.

Das, A., C. & Singh, S. (2013). Discrimination and Difference, racial and Colonial: An Overview of M.G Vassanji’s The Gunny Sack and No New Land. The Creation: An International Journal in English. Vol. 4, Issue 5.

Feenstra, H. (2009-2010). Circling the Self: the short story innovations of Katherine Mansfield and Virginia Woolf. INNERVATE Learning Undergraduate Work in English Studies, Vol. 2, pp 63-79.

Gandhi, L. (1998). Postcolonial Theory A critical introduction. Australia: Edinburgh University Press

Hook, D. (2005). Paradoxes of the Other: (Post) Colonial Racism, Racial Difference, Stereotype-As-Fetish. Psychology in society. Vol. 31, pp 9-30.

Mannerhovi, E. (2008). The Garden as Feminine Space in Katherine Mansfield’s Short Story. University of Tampere School of Modern Languages and Translation, Studies English Philology.

Rukundwa, L., S. & Aarde, A. (2007).The Formation of Postcolonial Theory. HTS Theological Studies. Vol. 63, No. 3.

Said, E. (1979). Orientalism. New York: Vintage Books.

Sarup, M. (1996).Identity, Culture and the Postmodern World. London: Edinburgh Universit y Press

Spivak, G. C. (2003). Can the Subaltern Speak?. London: Routledge.

Stazak, F. J. (2008) Other/otherness. International Encyclopedia of human Geography. Elsevier.

Stoica, D. (2013). Reading Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak in Rural Québec, or Saving “Exotic Women from “Exotic Men”: The Construction of the Religious Subaltern in Light of the 2007 Hérouxville Incident. Journal for Cultural and Religious Theory. Vol. 12, No. 3, pp 140-148. (http://www.writework.com/essay/doll-s-house-katherine-mansfield-summary). Accessed March 5, 2015.

Mansfield, K. (1922). What makes someone popular?.The Doll’s House. (http://www.americanliterature.com/author/katherine-mansfield/short-story/the-dolls-house). Accessed March 19, 2015.

Boddy, G. (1996). Story: Mansfield, Katherine. Dictionary of New Zealand Biography. (http://www.teara.govt.nz/en/biographies/3m42/mansfield-katherine). Accessed March 20, 2015.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


ETJ Stats